In addition to road transport and inland shipping, the 2023 Monitoring Report allowed for the first time the inclusion of a third transport carrier, and this concerns weather-related disruptions in the railway infrastructure. The issue of air transport has again not been included as a theme This is due to the fact that at the time when the DAS Strategy was first developed, various analyses showed that climate changes were expected to have only limited impacts on this sector158. In the meantime, potential impacts of climate change on air transport have been examined more closely, both at national and international level, leading to the identification of various relevant themes which are being examined in cooperation with the DWD within the framework of effects research. On the basis of the outcome of these assessments it may be possible to expand the indicator set by incorporating the air transport theme159. To date, another transport sector, i.e. public transport (ÖPNV) has been addressed only partly within the indicator on disruptions of the railway infrastructure. This is because there has so far been a lack of data and information on ÖPNV with a view to potential climate change impacts and adaptation measures required, to allow illustrating the theme within the indicator set.
Substantial impacts of climate change on transport include damage to transport infrastructures arising, in particular, from extreme weather events and consequential disruptions to traffic flow as well as accident risks. As far as road transport is concerned, data available from accident statistics allow a tentative approach to these themes. However, to render a clearer picture of the impacts of traffic flow, it would be necessary to obtain data on frequency and duration of traffic obstructions or congestions arising from causes such as heavy rain or storm. As far as the situation regarding road accidents is concerned, more in-depth information on potential impacts of summer heat and heat periods on driving behaviour and accident scenarios are required in order to bring the relevant indicator into sharper focus. For railway transport some of the data on disruption causes are not available in sufficient detail; for instance, in case of major disruptions, it is not possible to capture and record all the information required. In terms of DAS Monitoring, the indicator would be improved by incorporating the duration of disruptions.
In general, there is to date, in respect of all transport carriers, a shortage of systematically captured and evaluated data which would allow a quantitative description of the impacts of weather extremes on transport infrastructures. In respect of road, rail and shipping, it would be helpful to have cause-related information detailing, for instance, the costs of remedying damage or of maintaining infrastructures. The same applies to air transport infrastructures insofar as this theme will in future be integrated within the DAS Monitoring system. As a matter of principle, it would be desirable to have data available that allow a differentiated illustration of diverse regions such as floodplains, coasts or uplands in order to show their various vulnerabilities.
In the transport sector, it has not been possible so far to illustrate adaptation measures in terms of response indicators, although it is true to say that targeted adaptation activities are in progress for this action field. However, adaptation measures which are in the process of being carried out are, in many cases, beyond the scope of continuous data capture which would serve as a basis for regular illustration by means of indicators. This applies just as much to information-related measures such as offering data services, management tools or guidance notes as to regulatory measures such as the adaptation of technical standards and assessment bases. In order to facilitate the assessment of engineering measures such as the mitigation of problems in roads with poor drainage or safeguarding a minimum water level in waterways by means of river engineering, it would be desirable to introduce an ‘adaptation marker’ which would facilitate the allocation of targeted finance available for climate adaptation.
The expenditure required for measures to be carried out regularly for the operational management of transport infrastructures, such as maintenance-related dredging works in waterways or the management of vegetation on railway embankments, varies in accordance with a number of variables including climatic factors. Many of such measures will require adaptation to the challenges of climate change. For a quantitative illustration of the varying extent of such measures it is essential to ensure a differentiated capture of expenditure in terms of hours of work and costs. The illustration of operational measures for the optimisation of traffic flows and for temporal, spatial or intermodal relocation of passenger- and goods transports, would require a sophisticated assessment of fine-grained data on transport flows. This would require further research in order to obtain targeted guidance on suitable approaches to the development of monitoring indicators.