ISI-MIP – The Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project

Background and Goals

ISI-MIP is intended to provide a framework to collate a consistent set of climate impact data across sectors and scales. This will serve as a basis for model evaluation and improvement, allowing for improved estimates of the biophysical and socio-economic impacts of climate change at different levels of global warming. It also provides a unique opportunity for cross-sectoral integration.

This includes the provision of input data through a central database (these datasets will be collated in close collaboration with all participants), the management of an output data archive, and assurance of consistency across sectors and scales with respect to data, format and modelling protocol.

ISI-MIP is a community-driven modelling effort with the goal of providing cross-sectoral global impact assessments, based on the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) and Shared Socio-Economic Pathways (SSPs) scenarios. Based on these common background scenarios, a quantitative estimate of impacts using policy-relevant and society-focused metrics, and uncertainties for different sectors and from multiple impact models will be derived.

ISI-MIP was launched in 2012 with the ISI-MIP Fast Track, which brought together over 30 impact models and came to a successful end in January, 2013. The focus of this first phase was future projections of global impacts for multiple impact sectors (agriculture, water, biomes, malaria and coastal infrastructure) based on CMIP5 GCM simulations, and the results were cited widely in the fifth Assessment Report of the IPCC.

ISI-MIP2 was launched in May 2013, and includes additional sectors (permafrost, energy and fisheries), as well including regional models. Over 100 impact models have registered to participate and simulations have now begun. The scenarios for ISI-MIP2 were chosen to enable evaluation of the representation of the impacts of extreme weather events, which will in turn be used as a basis for model improvement.

While only global impact models participated in the ISI-MIP Fast Track, ISI-MIP2 will bring together both global and regional modelling groups. A common set of focus regions will allow for a comparison between global and regional (i.e. sub-global) models, as well as an integration of regional impacts from different sectors.

Content time

to

Research area/region

Country
  • transnational

Steps in the process of adaptation to climate change

Step 1: Understand and describe climate change

Approach and results 

Atmospheric CO2 concentrations were prescribed according to the four representative concentration pathways (RCPs) also used to drive the general circulation models(GCMs) within in the latest, fifth phase of the Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). To provide the associated climate information for ISI-MIP, five of the CMIP5 GCMs were selected to span the space of global mean temperature change and relative precipitation changes as best as possible, albeit with the limited available data in the CMIP5 archive at the relevant stage of the project.

The ISI-MIP climate dataset covers the period from 1960 through to 2099 on a horizontal grid with 0.5° × 0.5° resolution; where necessary, climate model output was spatially interpolated. The data were bias-corrected to ensure long-term statistical agreement with the observation-based watch forcing data over the period 1960–1999. Projected absolute trends in temperature and relative trends in precipitation and all other variables were preserved by the bias-correction method, which was developed specifically for this project. Preservation of the temperature trends in each grid cell also implies that the global warming trend and thus, in particular, the climate sensitivities of the GCMs, are preserved.

Of the 20 combinations of four RCPs and five GCMs considered, three exhibit global mean temperature greater than 4°C above present day (1980–2010) for the highest concentration scenario RCP8.5 in 2099. Note that the 1980–2010 reference period was also chosen as a baseline for the quantification of future climate impacts. This baseline period is ∼0.7°C warmer than preindustrial conditions. A set of 16 GCM-RCP combinations surpasses a warming of 1.3°C above 1980–2010, which corresponds to the internationally accepted threshold of 2°C above preindustrial. To illustrate the projected evolution of land-averaged precipitation, relative changes compared with the historical period are quantified in terms of global mean temperature. Both variables are filtered by a 30-y ⁠moving average⁠.

Parameter (climate signals)
  • Altered rainfall patterns
  • Higher average temperatures
Further Parameters 

all parameters of the climate models

Further times 

30-y moving average

Step 2a: Identify and assess risks - climate effects and impact

Approach and results 

Global impact models from five different sectors were involved in the ISI-MIP fast track: water, agriculture, biomes, coastal infrastructure, and malaria as an example of health impacts. The agricultural component of ISI-MIP was coordinated under the umbrella of the agro-economic model intercomparison(AgMIP) and an ISI-MIP component was included in the AgMIP.

Each impact model was driven by a common daily, gridded climate dataset and delivered results in the form of a sector-specific set of common output variables at time resolutions ranging from subdaily to monthly. Harmonization across models was limited to the driving climate input data and, where applicable, socio-economic data (population and gross domestic product, GDP). Additional input data were selected according to the default settings of each model, to gain a representative picture of uncertainty across the models using native settings.

The scenario suite for the ISI-MIP fast track was designed to allow for quantification of the uncertainty in the impacts of climate change—both across climate models and across impact models—at different levels of global warming. The list of chosen scenarios represents a balance between ensuring harmonization across the sectors and exploring the sector-specific modeling uncertainties.

Step 3: Develop and compare measures

Time horizon
  • 2011–2040 (near future)
  • 2021–2050 (near future)
  • 2036–2065
  • 2051–2080 (far future)
  • 2071–2100 (far future)

Participants

Funding / Financing 

Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)

Project management 

Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)

Cooperation/Partners 

IPCC Working Groups II and III;
IIASA – International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis;
Climate Service Center 2.0;

Over 130 institutes in over 90 cities are involved in ISI-MIP2.

Contact

PIK - Potsdam-Institut für Klimafolgenforschung
Telegraphenberg A 31
14473 Potsdam

Share:
Article:
Printer-friendly version
Fields of action:
 agriculture  biological diversity  coastal and marine protection  fishery  human health and care  water regime and water management  woodland and forestry  cross sectoral